Environmental & Public Health Consulting had the distinct pleasure and honor of working with a team from the UCLA Sustainable Technology and Policy Program in 2011 developing case studies to test whether complex decision-making as required for the assessment of safer alternatives under the California Safer Consumer Product Regulations was a viable option. EPHC and UCLA STPP are delighted to announce that our paper on this work was accepted for publication in Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, the publication of the Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC.) Click on the link below to read our paper, Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Regulatory Alternatives Analysis: A Case Study of Lead-Free Solder.
Most Recent
- Auto Draft
- Bay Area Climate Restoration Solutions: Perennial Industrial Feedstocks
- Bioplastics: Opportunities and Challenges
- Health, Wildfires, and Climate Change in California
- Systems Thinking Applied to Designing Safer Alternatives
- Systems Thinking Applied to Designing Safer Alternatives
- Recommendations to Governor Gavin Newsom
- Green Chemistry Recommendations for the European Commission
- Climate Change Resilience Planning in the San Francisco Bay Area
- Climate, Health, and Equity
- Green Chemistry and Carbon Sequestration
- EPHC and Berkeley Center for Green Chemistry to Assist Costco Wholesale
- Protecting the Most Vulnerable When Selecting Safer Alternatives
- Safer Alternatives in the Philippines
- The Post-Petroleum Chronicles: Bio-Economy is worth over a trillion Euro in Europe’s 5 biggest economies
- 1.7 million children a year lost to preventable pollution
- Researchers Estimate that Exposure to Hormone Disrupting Chemicals Costs 2% of US GDP
- Green Chemistry & Commerce Council (GC3) Retailer Leadership Council Training
- California Healthy Nail Salon Collaborative Wins Harvard’s Roy Award
- The Role of Green Chemistry in the Circular Economy